The governorship candidate of the Action Peoples Party (APP) in Abia State, Major General Ijioma Nwokoro Ijioma (retd), has pledged to run a transparent and accountable administration if elected governor in the 2027 elections.

Speaking after emerging as the party’s consensus candidate during its primary election in Umuahia, Ijioma said he would offer what he described as a credible alternative for the people of Abia State.

According to him, his vision is to build a modern state founded on justice, equity, responsible leadership, and economic empowerment. He added that his administration would prioritise the rule of law, transparency, and people-centred governance.

The retired military officer commended President Bola Tinubu for policies that have increased revenue allocations to states but criticised aspects of the Federal Government’s economic reforms, particularly the removal of fuel subsidy, which he said was implemented without adequate safeguards.

He argued that despite increased allocations from the Federal Government, the level of development in Abia State does not reflect the volume of resources received.

According to him, the state has received approximately ₦1.5 trillion in federal allocations under the current administration, yet many residents continue to face economic challenges.

Ijioma identified insecurity as one of the most pressing issues confronting the state, citing reports of kidnappings and attacks on farmers in various communities.

To address the problem, he promised to establish a technology-driven security framework capable of monitoring criminal activities across the state in real time.

He said his administration would focus on rapid response mechanisms and ensure that criminal activities are swiftly investigated and perpetrators brought to justice.

The APP candidate also pledged massive investment in infrastructure, food production, and programmes aimed at reducing poverty and hunger. He promised to promote fiscal discipline and prudent management of public resources.

Ijioma further questioned the cost-effectiveness of some projects executed by the current administration, arguing that government contracts and expenditures should be subjected to greater public scrutiny and transparency.

He cited concerns over the reported costs of certain road and bridge projects, insisting that citizens deserve clear explanations on how public funds are spent.

According to him, the true measure of governance should be the impact of policies and projects on the lives of ordinary people rather than public relations efforts or political messaging.