According to a report by The New York Times, Trump is said to be leaning toward carrying out a strike in the coming days to demonstrate to Iranian authorities that continued resistance could carry significant consequences. Iran, however, has repeatedly denied pursuing nuclear weapons and insists its programme is for peaceful purposes.

Rising Tensions and Military Posturing

Since the start of the year, the United States has significantly increased troop and equipment deployments in the Middle East, described as the largest build-up in more than two decades.

Trump reportedly met senior officials in the White House Situation Room last week to discuss potential strike options. He is said to have told advisers he would consider military action if ongoing negotiations fail to yield an agreement.

Potential targets under discussion reportedly include facilities linked to the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, nuclear installations, and elements of Iran’s ballistic missile programme. Trump is also said to be open to steps aimed at destabilising the leadership of Iran’s Supreme Leader, Ali Khamenei, though officials have acknowledged that such outcomes may not be achievable through airstrikes alone.

US officials had earlier explored the possibility of deploying special operations forces to strike deeply buried nuclear and missile sites. However, those plans have reportedly been put on hold due to the high risks involved.

Negotiations Continue

Despite the rhetoric, diplomatic engagement between Washington and Tehran remains ongoing. Indirect talks, which had paused following a 2025 US attack on Iranian facilities, resumed weeks ago and are expected to continue in Switzerland.

US Middle East envoy Steve Witkoff stated that Trump has drawn “very hard red lines,” insisting on “zero enrichment” by Iran. Washington is also demanding that Iran hand over more than 400 kilograms of enriched uranium currently in its possession.

Witkoff warned that Iran could be “about a week away” from producing industrial-grade material suitable for weapons, calling the prospect “very dangerous.”

Iran’s Response

Iran has vowed to retaliate against any American strike, warning that US interests in the Middle East — including bases and personnel — would be considered legitimate targets.

While rejecting the demand for zero enrichment, Tehran has indicated a willingness to compromise. Officials have suggested exporting part of their uranium stockpile, reducing enrichment levels, and even considering a regional enrichment consortium.

In return, Iran seeks formal recognition of its right to peaceful nuclear enrichment and the lifting of US sanctions that have heavily constrained its economy.

As both sides prepare for further talks, the coming weeks could prove decisive in determining whether diplomacy prevails — or whether tensions escalate into direct confrontation.